Paper detail

Hydrogen burning of $^{29}$Si and its impact on presolar stardust grains from classical novae

Presolar stardust grains found in primitive meteorites are believed to retain the isotopic composition of stellar outflows at the time of grain condensation. Therefore, laboratory measurements of their isotopic ratios represent sensitive probes for investigating open questions related to stellar evolution, stellar explosions, nucleosynthesis, mixing mechanisms, dust formation, and galactic chemical evolution. For a few selected presolar grains, classical novae have been discussed as a potential source. For SiC, silicate, and graphite presolar grains, the association is based on the observation of small $N(^{12}$C)/$N(^{13}$C) and $N(^{14}$N)/$N(^{15}$N) number abundance ratios compared to solar values, and abundance excesses in $^{30}$Si relative to $^{29}$Si, as previously predicted by models of classical novae. We report on a direct measurement of the $^{29}$Si(p,$γ$)$^{30}$P reaction, which strongly impacts simulated $δ^{29}$Si values from classical novae. Our new experimental $^{29}$Si(p,$γ$)$^{30}$P thermonuclear reaction rate differs from previous results by up to 50\% in the classical nova temperature range ($T$ $=$ $100$ $-$ $400$~MK), while the rate uncertainty is reduced by up to a factor of $3$. Using our new reaction rate in Monte Carlo reaction network and hydrodynamic simulations of classical novae, we estimate $δ^{29}$Si values with much reduced uncertainties. Our results establish $δ^{29}$Si values measured in presolar grains as a sensitive probe for assessing their classical nova paternity. We also demonstrate that $δ^{30}$Si values from nova simulations are presently not a useful diagnostic tool unless the large uncertainty of the $^{30}$P(p,$γ$)$^{31}$S reaction rate can be significantly reduced.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.