Paper detail

Hydrodynamics of Cloud Collisions in 2D: The Fate of Clouds in a Multi-phase Medium

We have studied head-on collisions between equal-mass, mildly supersonic (Mach number 1.5) HI clouds, in a standard Two-phase ISM (T_cl = 74 K, n_cl = 22 cm^-3, χ= 100). We explore the role of various factors, including the radiative cooling parameter η= t_rad/t_coll (t_coll=R_c/v_c), evolutionary modifications on the cloud structure (by colliding clouds ``evolved'' through independent motion within the intercloud medium (WIM)), and the symmetry of the problem (by colliding initially identical clouds, evolved to different ages before impact). The presence of bow shocks and ram pressure from material in the cloud wake, developed during such evolution through the WIM, significantly alters these interactions with respect to the standard case of non-evolved clouds. In general, in our adiabatic collisions the clouds are disrupted and convert their gas into a few low density contrast clumps. By contrast, for symmetric radiative cases we find that the two clouds coalesce, with almost all the initial kinetic energy radiated away. On the other hand, for both adiabatic and radiative collisions, asymmetric collisions have a much greater tendency to disrupt the two clouds. Fragmentation of the clouds may occur, and instabilities are in general enhanced. In addition, radiative cooling is less efficient in our asymmetric interactions, so that those parts of the clouds that initially seem to merge are more likely to re-expand and fade into the WIM. Since the majority of real cloud collisions should be asymmetric for one reason or another, we conclude that most gasdynamical diffuse cloud collisions will be disruptive, at least in the absence of significant self-gravity or of a significant magnetic field.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.