Paper detail

Hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters in dark energy cosmologies: II. c-M relation

We use hydrodynamical simulations of different dark energy cosmologies to investigate the concentration-mass (c-M) relation in galaxy clusters. In particular, we consider a reference ΛCDM model, two quintessence models with inverse power-law potentials (RP and SUGRA), and two extended quintessence models, one with positive and one with negative coupling with gravity (EQp and EQn respectively). All the models are normalized in order to match CMB data from WMAP3. We fit both the dark matter only and the total mass profile with a NFW profile, and recover the concentration of each halo from the fit using different definition. We consider both the complete catalog of clusters and groups and subsamples of objects at different level of relaxation. We find that the definition itself of the concentration can lead to differences up to 20% in its value and that these differences are smaller when more relaxed objects are considered. The c-M relation of our reference ΛCDM model is in good agreement with the results in literature, and relaxed objects have a higher normalization and a shallower slope with respect to the complete sample. The inclusion of baryon physics is found to influence more high-mass systems than low-mass ones, due to a higher concentration of baryons in the inner regions of massive halos. For the different dark energy models, we find that for ΛCDM, RP and SUGRA the normalization of the c-M relation is linked to the growth factor, with models having a higher value of σ8 D+ having also a higher normalization. This simple scheme is no longer valid for EQp and EQn because in these models a time dependent effective gravitational interaction, whose redshift evolution depends on the sign of the coupling, is present. This leads to a decrease (increase) of the expected normalization in the EQp (EQn) model. [Abridged]

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.