Paper detail

Hydrodynamic outcomes of planet scattering in transitional discs

A significant fraction of unstable multiple planet systems likely scatter during the transitional disc phase as gas damping becomes ineffectual. Using an ensemble of FARGO hydrodynamic simulations and MERCURY n-body integrations, we directly follow planet-disc and planet-planet interactions through the clearing phase and on through 50 Myr of dynamical evolution. Disc clearing occurs via X-ray driven photoevaporation. The hydrodynamic evolution of individual scattering systems is complex, and involves phases in which massive planets orbit within eccentric gaps, or accrete directly from the disc without a gap. Comparing the results to a gas-free model, we find that the n-body dynamics and hydrodynamics of scattering into one- and two-planet final states are almost identical. The eccentricity distributions in these channels are almost unaltered by the presence of gas. The hydrodynamic simulations, however, also form low eccentricity three-planet systems in long-term stable configurations, and the admixture of these systems results in modestly lower eccentricities in hydrodynamic as opposed to gas-free simulations. The incidence of these three-planet systems is likely a function of the initial conditions; different planet setups (number or spacing) may change the character of this result. We analyze the properties of surviving multiple planet systems, and show that only a small fraction (a few percent) enter mean-motion resonances after scattering, while a larger fraction form stable resonant chains and avoid scattering entirely. Our results remain consistent with the hypothesis that exoplanet eccentricity results from scattering, though the detailed agreement between observations and gas-free simulation results is likely coincidental. We discuss the prospects for testing scattering models by observing planets or non-axisymmetric gas structure in transitional discs.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.