Paper detail

Hydrodynamic limit for a 2D interlaced particle process

The Markov dynamics of interlaced particle arrays, introduced by A. Borodin and P. Ferrari in arXiv:0811.0682, is a classical example of (2+1)-dimensional random growth model belonging to the so-called Anisotropic KPZ universality class. In Legras-Toninelli (2017) arXiv:1704.06581, a hydrodynamic limit -- the convergence of the height profile, after space/time rescaling, to the solution of a deterministic Hamilton-Jacobi PDE with non-convex Hamiltonian -- was proven when either the initial profile is convex, or for small times, before the solution develops shocks. In the present work, we give a simpler proof, that works for all times and for all initial profiles for which the limit equation makes sense. In particular, the convexity assumption is dropped. The main new idea is a new viewpoint about "finite speed of propagation" that allows to bypass the need of a-priori control of the interface gradients, or equivalently of inter-particle distances.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.