Paper detail

Hydrated anions: From clusters to bulk solution with quasi-chemical theory

The interactions of hydrated ions with solution and interface partners are strong on a chemical energy scale. Here, we test the foremost \textit{ab initio theory} for evaluation of hydration free energies of ions, namely, \textit{quasi-chemical theory} (QCT). We focus on halide anions, but also the hydroxide anion, since they have been outstanding challenges for all theories. QCT is built by identification of inner-shell clusters, separate treatment of those clusters, then integration of those results into the broader-scale solution environment. We exploit a close comparison with mass-spectrometric measurements of ion-hydration equilibria. That theory-experiment comparison is excellent with moderate computational effort here. This agreement reinforces both theory and experiment, and provides a numerically accurate inner-shell contribution to QCT. The inner-shell complexes involving heavier halides display strikingly asymmetric hydration clusters. QCT provides a favorable setting for exploitation of the polarizable continuum model (PCM) when the inner-shell material shields the ion from the outer solution environment. For the asymmetrically hydrated, and less effectively shielded, heavier halide ions, we investigate an inverse procedure in which the inner-shell structures are sampled from readily available AIMD calculations on the bulk solutions. This inverse procedure is a remarkable improvement and our final results are in close agreement with a standard tabulation of hydration free energies. Comparison of anion hydration cluster structures with bulk solutions from AIMD simulations emphasize slight differences: the asymmetries of bulk solution inner-shell structures are moderated, but still present; and inner shells fill to slightly higher average coordination numbers in bulk solution than in clusters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.