Paper detail

HyDRA-H: Simultaneous Hybrid Retrieval of Exoplanetary Emission Spectra

High-resolution Doppler spectroscopy has been used to detect several chemical species in exoplanetary atmospheres. Such detections have traditionally relied on cross correlation of observed spectra against spectral model templates, an approach that is successful for detecting chemical species but not optimised for constraining abundances. Recent work has explored ways to perform atmospheric retrievals on high-resolution spectra (HRS) and combine them with retrievals routinely performed for low-resolution spectra (LRS) by developing a mapping from the cross correlation function to a likelihood metric. We build upon previous studies and report HyDRA-H, a hybrid retrieval code for simultaneous analysis of low- and high- resolution thermal emission spectra of exoplanets in a fully Bayesian approach. We demonstrate HyDRA-H on the hot Jupiter HD 209458b as a case study. We validate our HRS retrieval capability by confirming previous results and report a simultaneous hybrid retrieval using both HRS and LRS data. The LRS data span the HST WFC3 (1.1-1.7 $μ$m) and Spitzer photometry (IRAC 3.6-8 $μ$m) bands, while the HRS data were obtained with CRIRES on VLT at 2.3 $μ$m. The constraints on the composition and temperature profiles for the hybrid retrieval are more stringent than retrievals with either LRS or HRS datasets individually. We retrieve abundances of $\log(\mathrm{H_2O)} = -4.11^{+0.91}_{-0.30}$ and $\log(\mathrm{CO}) = {-2.16}^{+0.99}_{-0.47}$, and $\mathrm{C/O} = 0.99^{+0.01}_{-0.02}$, consistent with previous works. We constrain the photospheric temperature to be $1498^{+216}_{-57}$ K, consistent with the equilibrium temperature. Our results demonstrate the significant advantages of hybrid retrievals by combining strengths of both HRS and LRS observations which probe complementary aspects of exoplanetary atmospheres.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.