Paper detail

Hybrid quantum network design against unauthorized secret-key generation, and its memory cost

A significant number of servers that constitute the Internet are to provide private data via private communication channels to mutually anonymous registered users. Such are the servers of banks, hospitals that provide cloud storage and many others. Replacing communication channels by maximally entangled states is a promising idea for the quantum-secured Internet (QI). While it is an important idea for large distances secure communication, for the case of the mentioned class of servers pure entanglement based solution is not only unnecessary but also opens a threat. A crack stimulating a node to generate secure connections via entanglement swapping between two hackers can cause uncontrolled consumption of resources. Turning into positive a recently proven no-go result by S. Bäuml et al. [15], we propose a natural countermeasure against this threat. The solution bases on connections between hub-nodes and end-users realized with states that contain secure key but do not allow for swapping of this key.We then focus on the study of the quantum memory cost of such a scheme and prove a fundamental lower bound on its memory overhead. In particular, we show that to avoid the possibility of entanglement swapping, it is necessary to store at least twice as much memory than it is the case in standard quantum-repeater-based network design. For schemes employing either states with positive partial transposition that approximates certain privates states or private states hardly distinguishable from their attacked versions, we derive much tighter lower bounds on required memory. Our considerations yield upper bounds on a two-way repeater rate for states with positive partial transposition (PPT), which approximates strictly irreducible private states. As a byproduct, we provide a lower bound on the trace distance between PPT and private states, shown previously only for private bits.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.