Paper detail

Hunting modifications of gravity: from the lab to cosmology via compact objects

Modifications of gravity have been considered to model the primordial inflation and the late-time cosmic acceleration. Provided that modified gravity models do not suffer from theoretical instabilities, they must be confronted with observations, not only at the cosmological scales, but also with the local tests of gravity, in the lab and in the Solar System, as well as at the astrophysical scales. Considering in particular sub-classes of the Horndeski gravity, we study their observational predictions at different scales. In order to pass the local tests of gravity while allowing for long-range interactions in cosmology, Horndeski gravity exhibits screening mechanisms, among them the chameleon. The chameleon screening mechanism has been tested recently using atom interferometry in a vacuum chamber. Numerical simulations are provided in this thesis in order to refine the analytical predictions. At the astrophysical scale, Horndeski gravity predicts a variation of the gravitational coupling inside compact stars. Focusing on Higgs inflation, we discuss to what extent the Higgs vacuum expectation value varies inside stars and conclude whether the effect is detectable in gravitational and nuclear physics. Finally, the covariant Galileon model exhibits non-linearities in the scalar field kinetic term such that it might pass the local tests of gravity thanks to the Vainshtein screening mechanism. We discuss if a sub-class of the covariant Galileon theory dubbed the Fab Four model leads to a viable inflationary phase and provide combined analysis with neutron stars and Solar System observables.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.