Paper detail

Human-AI Interaction for User Safety in Social Matching Apps: Involving Marginalized Users in Design

In this position paper we intend to advocate for participatory design methods and mobile social matching apps as ripe contexts for exploring novel human-AI interactions that benefit marginalized groups. Mobile social matching apps like Tinder and Bumble use AI to introduce users to each other for rapid face-to-face meetings. These user discoveries and subsequent interactions pose disproportionate risk of sexual violence and other harms to marginalized user demographics, specifically women and the LGBTQIA+ community. We want to extend the role of AI in these apps to keep users safe while they interact with strangers across online and offline modalities. To do this, we are using participatory design methods to empower women and LGBTQIA+ individuals to envision future human-AI interactions that prioritize their safety during social matching app-use. In one study, stakeholders identifying as LGBTQIA+ or women are redesigning dating apps to mediate exchange of sexual consent and therefore mitigate sexual violence. In the other study, women are designing multi-purpose, opportunistic social matching apps that foreground women's safety.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.