Paper detail

Hubble Space Telescope Spectroscopic Observations of the Ejecta of SN 1987A at 2000 Days

We have used the Faint Object Spectrograph on the Hubble Space Telescope to observe the spectra of SN 1987A over the wavelength range 2000 -- 8000\ Å on dates 1862 and 2210 days after the supernova outburst. Even these pre-COSTAR observations avoid much of the contamination from the bright stars nearby and provide a very useful set of line strengths and shapes for analysis. The spectrum is formed in an unusual physical setting: cold gas which is excited and ionized by energetic electrons from the radioactive debris of the supernova explosion. The spectra of SN 1987A at this phase are surprisingly similar to those of the nova shells of CP Puppis and T Pyxidis decades after outburst. SN 1987A and the novae are characterized by emission from material with electron temperatures of only a few hundred degrees Kelvin, and show narrow Balmer continuum emission and strong emission lines from O$^+$. The Balmer continuum shape requires the electron temperature in the supernova ejecta to be as low as 500 K on day 1862 and 400 K on day 2210 after outburst. The \OIIUV\ doublet is surprisingly strong and is plausibly powered by collisional ionization of neutral oxygen to excited states of O$^+$. The line intensity ratio of the \OID\ doublet obtained from Gaussian fits of the line profiles is 1.8$\pm0.2$, contrary to the optically thin limit of 3. This ratio is {\it not} due to an optical depth effect, but rather is an artifact of assuming a Gaussian profile to fit the \OID\ doublet profile. Specifying the line ratio $R\, = \, F([{\rm OI}]6300)/F([{\rm OI}]6364)$ = 3 is consistent with the data and allows a calculation of the decomposed line profile. All the observed strong lines are found to be blueshifted by a similar amount

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.