Paper detail

Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids

Determining the size distribution of asteroids is key for understanding the collisional history and evolution of the inner Solar System. We aim at improving our knowledge on the size distribution of small asteroids in the Main Belt by determining the parallaxes of newly detected asteroids in the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Archive and hence their absolute magnitudes and sizes. Asteroids appear as curved trails in HST images due to the parallax induced by the fast orbital motion of the spacecraft. The parallax effect can be computed to obtain the distance to the asteroids by fitting simulated trajectories to the observed trails. Using distance, we can obtain the object's absolute magnitude and size estimation assuming an albedo value, along with some boundaries for its orbital parameters. In this work we analyse a set of 632 serendipitously imaged asteroids found in the ESA HST Archive. An object-detection machine learning algorithm was used to perform this task during previous work. Our raw data consists of 1,031 asteroids trails from unknown objects (not matching any entries in the MPC database). We also found 670 trails from known objects (objects featuring matching entries in the MPC). After an accuracy assessment and filtering process, our analysed HST set consists of 454 unknown objects and 178 known objects. We obtain a sample dominated by potential Main Belt objects featuring absolute magnitudes (H) mostly between 15 and 22 mag. The absolute magnitude cumulative distribution confirms the previously reported slope change for 15 < H < 18, from 0.56 to 0.26, maintained in our case down to absolute magnitudes around H = 20, hence expanding the previous results by approximately two magnitudes. HST archival observations can be used as an asteroid survey since the telescope pointings are statistically randomly oriented in the sky and they cover long periods of time.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.