Paper detail

HST Proper Motions of NGC 147 and NGC 185: Orbital Histories and Test of Dynamically Coherent Andromeda Satellite Plane

We present the first proper motion (PM) measurements for the dwarf elliptical galaxies NGC 147 and NGC 185, two satellite galaxies of M31, using multi-epoch HST imaging data with time baselines of $\sim 8$ years. For each galaxy, we take an error-weighted average of measurements from HST ACS/WFC and WFC3/UVIS to determine the PMs. Our final results for the PMs are $(μ_\mathrm{W}, μ_\mathrm{N})_\mathrm{N147} = (-0.0232, 0.0378) \pm (0.0143, 0.0146)\,\mathrm{mas}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ for NGC 147, and $(μ_\mathrm{W}, μ_\mathrm{N})_\mathrm{N185} = (-0.0242, 0.0058) \pm (0.0141, 0.0147)\,\mathrm{mas}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ for NGC 185. The 2-dimensional direction of motion for NGC 147 about M31 is found to be aligned with its tidal tails. The 3-d positions and velocities of both galaxies are transformed into a common M31-centric coordinate system to study the detailed orbital histories of the combined M31+NGC 147+NGC 185 system via numerical orbit integration. We find that NGC 147 (NGC 185) had its closest passage to M31 0.3-0.5~Gyr ($\gtrsim 1.6$~Gyr) within the past 6 Gyr at distances of $\sim 70$ kpc (70-260 kpc). The pericentric times of NGC 147/NGC 185 correlate qualitatively well with the presence/absence of tidal tails seen around the galaxies. Our PMs show that the orbital poles of NGC 147, and also NGC 185 albeit to a lesser degree, agree within the uncertainties with the normal of the Great Plane of Andromeda (GPoA). These are the first measurements of the 3-d angular momentum vector of any satellite identified as original GPoA members. Our results strengthen the hypothesis that the GPoA may be a dynamically coherent entity. We revisit previous claims that NGC 147 and NGC 185 are binary galaxies and conclude that it is very unlikely the two galaxies were ever gravitationally bound to each other.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.