Paper detail

HS 1700+6416: the first high redshift non lensed NAL-QSO showing variable high velocity outflows

We present a detailed analysis of the X-ray emission of HS 1700+6416, a high redshift (z=2.7348), luminous quasar, classified as a Narrow Absorption Line (NAL) quasar on the basis of its SDSS spectrum. The source has been observed 9 times by Chandra and once by XMM from 2000 to 2007. Long term variability is clearly detected, between the observations, in the 2-10 keV flux varying by a factor of three (~3-9x10^-14 erg s^-1 cm^-2) and in the amount of neutral absorption (Nh < 10^22 cm^-2 in 2000 and 2002 and Nh=4.4+-1.2x10^22 cm^-2 in 2007). Most interestingly, one broad absorption feature is clearly detected at 10.3+-0.7 keV (rest frame) in the 2000 Chandra observation, while two similar features, at 8.9+-0.4 and at 12.5+-0.7 keV, are visible when the 8 contiguous Chandra observations of 2007 are stacked together. In the XMM observation of 2002, strongly affected by background flares, there is a hint for a similar feature at 8.0+-0.3 keV. We interpreted these features as absorption lines from a high velocity, highly ionized (i.e. Fe XXV, FeXXVI) outflowing gas. In this scenario, the outflow velocities inferred are in the range v=0.12-0.59c. To reproduce the observed features, the gas must have high column density (Nh>3x10^23 cm^-2), high ionization parameter (log(xi)>3.3 erg cm s^-1) and a large range of velocities (Delta V~10^4 km s^-1). This Absorption Line QSO is the fourth high-z quasar displaying X-ray signatures of variable, high velocity outflows, and among these, is the only one non-lensed. A rough estimate of the minimum kinetic energy carried by the wind of up to 18% L(bol), based on a biconical geometry of the wind, implies that the amount of energy injected in the outflow environment is large enough to produce effective mechanical feedback.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.