Paper detail

How Well Do Remote Labs Work? A Case Study at Princeton University

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic forced many universities to move to virtual instruction during the spring 2020 semester. The transition to remote learning was abrupt and overwhelming for teachers of all subjects, all across the US. Nowhere was this more true than in science lab courses. The experience nevertheless provides an opportunity to investigate the optimal design of remote labs, with similar learning goals as in-person labs. In this study we explore the three most common approaches to remote labs: recorded experiments, applet-based experiments, and at-home projects. We use surveys and interviews to make two comparisons: remote labs vs. in-person labs; the different types of remote labs. Examining these two questions we find that remote labs perform as well as in-person labs and students learn the most from at home physics experiments while also enjoying those the most.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.