Paper detail

How to squeeze the toothpaste back into the tube

We consider "bridges" for the simple exclusion process on Z, either symmetric or asymmetric, in which particles jump to the right at rate p and to the left at rate 1-p. The initial state O has all negative sites occupied and all non-negative sites empty. We study the probability that the process is again in state O at time t, and the behaviour of the process on [0,t] conditioned on being in state O at time t. In the case p=1/2, we find that such a bridge typically goes a distance of order t (in the sense of graph distance) from the initial state. For the asymmetric systems, we note an interesting duality which shows that bridges with parameters p and 1-p have the same distribution; the maximal distance of the process from the original state behaves like c(p)log(t) for some constant c(p) depending on p. (For p>1/2, the front particle therefore travels much less far than the bridge of the corresponding random walk, even though in the unconditioned process the path of the front particle dominates a random walk.) We mention various further questions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.