Paper detail

How to optimally combine pre-reconstruction full shape and post-reconstruction BAO signals

We review the different approaches for combining the cosmological information from the full shape of the pre-reconstructed power spectrum - usually referred as redshift-space distortion (RSD) analysis - and from the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) peak position in the post-reconstructed power spectrum with the aim of finding the optimal procedure. We focus on combining the pre- and post-reconstructed derived quantities at different compression levels: 1) the two-point summary statistics, the power spectrum multipoles, $P^{(\ell)}(k)$; 2) the compressed BAO variables, $α_{\parallel,\perp}$; and 3) an hybrid approach between 1) and 2). We apply these methods to the publicly available eBOSS Luminous Red Galaxy catalogues, for both data and synthetic EZ-mocks. We find that the three approaches result in very consistent posteriors when the appropriate covariance matrix estimator is used. On average, the combination at $P^{(\ell)}(k)$ level retrieves $5-10\%$ tighter constraints than the other two approaches, demonstrating that the standard approach of combining at the level of the BAO variables is nearly optimal. We conclude that combining both BAO post-reconstructed and full shape pre-reconstructed signals for the one single data realization at the level of the summary statistics is faster, as it does not require running the whole pipeline on the individual mocks, and brings a moderate $10\%$ improvement, with respect to the other two studied methods. Moreover, we check for potential systematics, such as, the way the matrix is built and the effect of the finite number of mocks on the likelihood estimator and find none of these have a significant impact in the final results. Combining the pre- and post-reconstruction signals at the level of the summary statistics is an attractive, faster and accurate method to be used in future and on-going spectroscopic surveys.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.