Paper detail

How to lose as little as possible

Suppose Alice has a coin with heads probability $q$ and Bob has one with heads probability $p>q$. Now each of them will toss their coin $n$ times, and Alice will win iff she gets more heads than Bob does. Evidently the game favors Bob, but for the given $p,q$, what is the choice of $n$ that maximizes Alice's chances of winning? The problem of determining the optimal $N$ first appeared in \cite{wa}. We show that there is an essentially unique value $N(q,p)$ of $n$ that maximizes the probability $f(n)$ that the weak coin will win, and it satisfies $\frac{1}{2(p-q)}-\frac12\le N(q,p)\le \frac{\max{(1-p,q)}}{p-q}$. The analysis uses the multivariate form of Zeilberger's algorithm to find an indicator function $J_n(q,p)$ such that $J>0$ iff $n<N(q,p)$ followed by a close study of this function, which is a linear combination of two Legendre polynomials. An integration-based algorithm is given for computing $N(q,p)$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.