Paper detail

How to Identify and Separate Bright Galaxy Clusters from the Low-frequency Radio Sky?

In this work we simulate the $50-200$ MHz radio sky that is constrained in the field of view ($5^{\circ}$ radius) of the 21 Centimeter Array (21CMA), by carrying out Monte-Carlo simulations to model redshifted cosmological reionization signals and strong contaminating foregrounds, including emissions from our Galaxy, galaxy clusters, and extragalactic point sources. As an improvement of previous works, we consider in detail not only random variations of morphological and spectroscopic parameters within the ranges allowed by multi-band observations, but also evolution of radio halos in galaxy clusters, assuming that relativistic electrons are re-accelerated in the ICM in merger events and lose energy via both synchrotron emission and inverse Compton scattering with CMB photons. By introducing a new approach designed on the basis of independent component analysis (ICA) and wavelet detection algorithm, we prove that, with a cumulative observation of one month with the 21CMA array, about $80\%$ of galaxy clusters with central brightness temperatures of $> 10~{\rm K}$ at 65 MHz can be safely identified and separated from the overwhelmingly bright foreground. We find that the morphological and spectroscopic distortions are extremely small as compared to the input simulated clusters, and the reduced $χ^2$ of brightness temperature profiles and spectra are controlled to be $\lesssim 0.5$ and $\lesssim 1.3$, respectively. These results robustly indicate that in the near future a sample of dozens of bright galaxy clusters will be disentangled from the foreground in 21CMA observations, the study of which will greatly improve our knowledge about cluster merger rates, electron acceleration mechanisms in cluster radio halos, and magnetic field in the ICM.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.