Paper detail

How to distinguish starbursts and quiescently star-forming galaxies: The `bimodal' submillimetre galaxy population as a case study

In recent work (arXiv:1101.0002) we have suggested that the high-redshift (z ~ 2-4) bright submillimetre galaxy (SMG) population is heterogeneous, with major mergers contributing both at early stages, where quiescently star-forming discs are blended into one submm source (`galaxy-pair SMGs'), and late stages, where mutual tidal torques drive gas inflows and cause strong starbursts. Here we combine hydrodynamic simulations of major mergers with 3-D dust radiative transfer calculations to determine observational diagnostics that can distinguish between quiescently star-forming SMGs and starburst SMGs via integrated data alone. We fit the far-IR SEDs of the simulated galaxies with the optically thin single-temperature modified blackbody, the full form of the single-temperature modified blackbody, and a power-law temperature-distribution model. The effective dust temperature, T_dust, and power-law index of the dust emissivity in the far-IR, β, derived can significantly depend on the fitting form used, and the intrinsic β of the dust is not recovered. However, for all forms used here, there is a T_dust above which almost all simulated galaxies are starbursts, so a T_dust cut is very effective at selecting starbursts. Simulated merger-induced starbursts also have higher L_IR/M_gas and L_IR/L_FUV than quiescently star-forming galaxies and lie above the star formation rate-stellar mass relation. These diagnostics can be used to test our claim that the SMG population is heterogeneous and to observationally determine what star formation mode dominates a given galaxy population. We comment on applicability of these diagnostics to ULIRGs that would not be selected as SMGs. These `hot-dust ULIRGs' are typically starburst galaxies lower in mass than SMGs, but they can also simply be SMGs observed from a different viewing angle.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.