Paper detail

How to best sample a solution manifold?

Model reduction attempts to guarantee a desired "model quality", e.g. given in terms of accuracy requirements, with as small a model size as possible. This article highlights some recent developments concerning this issue for the so called Reduced Basis Method (RBM) for models based on parameter dependent families of PDEs. In this context the key task is to sample the {\em solution manifold} at judiciously chosen parameter values usually determined in a {\em greedy fashion}. The corresponding {\em space growth} concepts are closely related to so called {\em weak greedy} algorithms in Hilbert and Banach spaces which can be shown to give rise to convergence rates comparable to the best possible rates, namely the {\em Kolmogorov $n$-widths} rates. Such algorithms can be interpreted as {\em adaptive sampling} strategies for approximating compact sets in Hilbert spaces. We briefly discuss the results most relevant for the present RBM context. The applicability of the results for weak greedy algorithms has however been confined so far essentially to well-conditioned coercive problems. A critical issue is therefore an extension of these concepts to a wider range of problem classes for which the conventional methods do not work well. A second main topic of this article is therefore to outline recent developments of RBMs that do realize $n$-width rates for a much wider class of variational problems covering indefinite or singularly perturbed unsymmetric problems. A key element in this context is the design of {\em well-conditioned variational formulations} and their numerical treatment via saddle point formulations. We conclude with some remarks concerning the relevance of uniformly approximating the whole solution manifold also when the {\em quantity of interest} is only of a {\em functional} of the parameter dependent solutions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.