Paper detail

How to Attack the NP-complete Dag Realization Problem in Practice

We study the following fundamental realization problem of directed acyclic graphs (dags). Given a sequence S:=(a_1,b_1),...,(a_n, b_n) with a_i, b_i in Z_0^+, does there exist a dag (no parallel arcs allowed) with labeled vertex set V:= {v_1,...,v_n} such that for all v_i in V indegree and outdegree of v_i match exactly the given numbers a_i and b_i, respectively? Recently this decision problem has been shown to be NP-complete by Nichterlein (2011). However, we can show that several important classes of sequences are efficiently solvable. In previous work (Berger and Mueller-Hannemann, FCT2011), we have proved that yes-instances always have a special kind of topological order which allows us to reduce the number of possible topological orderings in most cases drastically. This leads to an exact exponential-time algorithm which significantly improves upon a straightforward approach. Moreover, a combination of this exponential-time algorithm with a special strategy gives a linear-time algorithm. Interestingly, in systematic experiments we observed that we could solve a huge majority of all instances by the linear-time heuristic. This motivates us to develop characteristics like dag density and "distance to provably easy sequences" which can give us an indicator how easy or difficult a given sequence can be realized. Furthermore, we propose a randomized algorithm which exploits our structural insight on topological sortings and uses a number of reduction rules. We observe that it clearly outperforms all other variants and behaves surprisingly well for almost all instances. Another striking observation is that our simple linear-time algorithm solves a set of real-world instances from different domains, namely ordered binary decision diagrams (OBDDs), train and flight schedules, as well as instances derived from food-web networks without any exception.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.