Paper detail

How should the contact angle of a noncircular wetting boundary be described?

For over 200 years, wettability has made significant contributions to understanding the properties of objects, advancing technological progress. Theoretical model of the contact angle (CA) for evaluating wettability has constantly been modified to address relevant emerging issues. However, these existing models disregard the difference in the CA along the contact line and use a single-point CA to evaluate the entire contact line. From this perspective, there is no reasonable explanation for noncircular wetting. Here, we reveal that noncircular wetting boundaries result from property differences in the surfaces along the boundary, and utilize friction as a comprehensive factor reflecting local wettability. Average CA is proposed to evaluate the contact line instead of the single-point CA, making the Cassie method and Wenzel method obsolete, which will take an average property of the whole surface as a weight coefficient of the single-point CA, ignoring the subordination between physical properties and roughness in systematics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.