Paper detail

How sharp is the chiral crossover phenomenon for realistic meson masses?

The mass dependence of the chiral phase transition is studied in the linear $SU(3)\times SU(3)$ sigma-model to leading order in a $1/N_f$-expansion, $N_f$ denoting the number of flavours. For realistic meson masses we find a smooth crossover between $T\sim181.5$ to 192.6~[MeV]. The crossover looks more rapid in the light quark condensate than in thermodynamic quantities like the energy and entropy densities. The change in the light quark condensate in this temperature interval is $\sim$~50\% of the zero-temperature condensate value, while the entropy density increases by ($5.5\pm0.8)\cdot10^{-3}$~[GeV$^3$]. Since the numerical error is particularly large in this region, we cannot rule out a finite latent heat smaller than 0.2~[GeV/fm$^3$]. The chiral transition is washed out for an average pseudoscalar meson octet mass of 203~[MeV]. This gives an upper bound on the first-order transition region in the meson mass parameter space. The corresponding ratio of critical to realistic light current quark masses $m^{crit}_{u,d}/m_{u,d}$ is estimated as $0.26\pm0.08$. This result is by an order of magnitude larger than the corresponding mean-field value. Therefore the

preprint1994arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.