Paper detail

How sensitive are high-pt electron spectra at RHIC to heavy quark energy loss?

In nucleus-nucleus collisions, high-pt electron spectra depend on the medium modified fragmentation of their massive quark parents, thus giving novel access to the predicted mass hierarchy of parton energy loss. Here we calculate these spectra in a model, which supplements the perturbative QCD factorization formalism with parton energy loss. In general, we find - within large errors - rough agreement between theory and data on the single inclusive electron spectrum in pp, its nuclear modification factor, and its azimuthal anisotropy. However, the nuclear modification factor depends on the relative contribution of charm and bottom production, which we find to be affected by large perturbative uncertainties. In order for electron measurements to provide a significantly more stringent test of the expected mass hierarchy, one must then disentangle the b- and c-decay contributions, for instance by reconstructing the displaced decay vertices.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.