Paper detail

How robustly can we constrain the low-mass end of the $z\sim6-7$ stellar mass function? -- The limits of lensing models and stellar population assumptions in the Hubble Frontier Fields

We present new measurements of the very low-mass end of the galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) at $z\sim6-7$ computed from a rest-frame ultraviolet selected sample of dropout galaxies. These galaxies lie behind the six Hubble Frontier Fields clusters and are all gravitationally magnified. Using deep Spitzer/IRAC and Hubble Space Telescope imaging, we derive stellar masses by fitting galaxy spectral energy distributions and explore the impact of different model assumptions and parameter degeneracies on the resulting GSMF. Our sample probes stellar masses down to $M_{\star}>10^{6}\,\text{M}_{\odot}$ and we find the $z\sim6-7$ GSMF to be best parametrized by a modified Schechter function which allows for a turnover at very low masses. Using a Monte-Carlo Markov Chain analysis of the GSMF, including accurate treatment of lensing uncertainties, we obtain a relatively steep low-mass end slope $α\simeq-1.96_{-0.08}^{+0.09}$ and a turnover at $\log(M_T/\text{M}_{\odot})\simeq7.10_{-0.56}^{+0.17}$ with a curvature of $β\simeq1.00_{-0.73}^{+0.87}$ for our minimum assumption model with constant star-formation history (SFH) and low dust attenuation, $A_V\leq0.2$. We find that the $z\sim6-7$ GSMF, in particular its very low-mass end, is significantly affected by the assumed functional form of the star formation history and the degeneracy between stellar mass and dust attenuation. For example, the low-mass end slope ranges from $α\simeq-1.82_{-0.07}^{+0.08}$ for an exponentially rising SFH to $α\simeq-2.34_{-0.10}^{+0.11}$ when allowing $A_V$ of up to 3.25. Future observations at longer wavelengths and higher angular resolution with the James Webb Space Telescope are required to break these degeneracies and to robustly constrain the stellar mass of galaxies on the extreme low-mass end of the GSMF.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.