Paper detail

How rapidly do supermassive black hole "seeds" grow at early times?

We investigate the physical conditions for the growth of intermediate mass seed black holes assumed to have formed from remnants of the first generation of massive stars. We follow the collapse of high-sigma halos with Tvir > 1e4 K using cosmological, smooth-particle hydrodynamic (SPH) simulations in the standard LCDM model. During collapse of the parent halo the seed holes are incorporated through mergers into larger systems and accrete mass from the surrounding gas. We include a self-consistent treatment of star formation, black hole accretion and associated feedback processes. Even under optimistic assumptions for the seed black hole mass and for efficient merger rates, we find that seed holes in halos M<1e10 Msun never reach the conditions for critical Eddington growth. Most of the black hole growth in this regime is determined by the initial mass and the merger rates. Critical accretion rates are reached, albeit only after a significant delay, at the time of collapse z~7) for 3-4 sigma halos of M~1e11 Msun. Our results imply M_BH = 5e6 Msun (M_halo/1e11 Msun)^0.78 at the time of collapse. The required conditions of Eddington growth to explain the build-up of supermassive black holes (~1e9 Msun), as implied by Sloan quasars at z>6, are therefore hard to meet in such a scenario. Without a 'jump-start' these conditions may be only achieved in extremely rare halos with M_halo > 1e13 Msun that collapsed before z~6. The sub-Eddington regime in which black holes holes accrete at early time implies a small contribution to the reionization by miniquasar but still sufficient to cause appreciable heating of the IGM at z<15-18.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.