Paper detail

How much primordial tensor mode is allowed?

The presence of a significant amount of gravitational radiation in the early Universe affects the total energy density and hence the expansion rate in the early epoch. In this work, we develop a physical model to connect the parameter of relativistic degree of freedom $N_\mathrm{eff}$ with the amplitude and shape of primordial tensor power spectrum, and use the CMB temperature and polarization data from {\it Planck} and BICEP2/KECK Array, and the primordial deuterium measurement from damped Lyman-$α$ (DLA) systems to constrain this model. We find that with this extra relation $ΔN_{\rm eff}(r,n_{\rm t})$, the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ is constrained to be $r<0.07$ ($3σ$ C.L.) and the tilt of tensor power spectrum is $n_\mathrm{t}=-0.01\pm 0.31$ ($1σ$ C.L.) for {\it Planck}+BICEP2+KECK+[D/H] data. This achieves a much tighter constraint on the tensor spectrum and provides a stringent test for cosmic inflation models. In addition, the current constraint on $N_{\rm eff}=3.122 \pm 0.171$ excludes the possibility of fourth neutrino species at more than $5σ$ C.L.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.