Paper detail

How Many Queries Will Resolve Common Randomness?

A set of m terminals, observing correlated signals, communicate interactively to generate common randomness for a given subset of them. Knowing only the communication, how many direct queries of the value of the common randomness will resolve it? A general upper bound, valid for arbitrary signal alphabets, is developed for the number of such queries by using a query strategy that applies to all common randomness and associated communication. When the underlying signals are independent and identically distributed repetitions of m correlated random variables, the number of queries can be exponential in signal length. For this case, the mentioned upper bound is tight and leads to a single-letter formula for the largest query exponent, which coincides with the secret key capacity of a corresponding multiterminal source model. In fact, the upper bound constitutes a strong converse for the optimum query exponent, and implies also a new strong converse for secret key capacity. A key tool, estimating the size of a large probability set in terms of Renyi entropy, is interpreted separately, too, as a lossless block coding result for general sources. As a particularization, it yields the classic result for a discrete memoryless source.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.