Paper detail

How loud are echoes from exotic compact objects?

The first direct observations of gravitational waves (GWs) by the LIGO collaboration have motivated different tests of General Relativity (GR), including the search for extra pulses following the GR waveform for the coalescence of compact objects. The motivation for these searches comes from the alternative proposal that the final compact object could differ from a black hole (BH) by the lack of an event horizon and a central singularity. Such objects are expected in theories that, motivated by quantum gravity modifications, predict horizonless objects as the final stage of gravitational collapse. In such a hypothetical case, this exotic compact object (ECO) will present a (partially) reflective surface at $r_{\rm ECO}=r_{+}(1+ε)$, instead of an event horizon at $r_{+}$. For this class of objects, an in-falling wave will not be completely lost and will give rise to secondary pulses, to which recent literature refers as echoes. However, the largely unknown ECO reflectivity is determinant for the amplitude of the signal, and details also depend on the initial conditions of the progenitor compact binary. Here, for the first time, we obtain estimates for the detectability of the first echo, using a perturbative description for the inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform and a physically-motivated ECO reflectivity. Binaries with comparable masses will have a stronger first echo, improving the chances of detection. For a case like GW150914, the detection of the first echo will require a minimum ringdown signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the range $\sim 20-60$. The most optimistic scenario for echo detection could already be probed by LIGO in the next years. With the expected improvements in sensitivity we estimate one or two events per year to have the required SNR for the first echo detection during O4.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.