Paper detail

How Kirkwood and Probability Distributions Differ: A Coxian Perspective

Kolmogorov's first axiom of probability is probability takes values between 0 and 1; however, in Cox's derivation of probability having a maximum value of unity is arbitrary since he derives probability as a tool to rank degrees of plausibility. Probability can then be used to make inferences in instances of incomplete information, which is the foundation of Baysian probability theory. This article formulates a rule, which if obeyed, allows probability to take complex values and still be consistent with the interpretation of probability theory as being a tool to rank plausibility. It is then shown that Kirkwood distributions and the conditional complex probability distributions proposed by Hofmann do not obey this rule and therefore cannot rank plausibility. Not only do these quasiprobability distributions relax Kolmogorov's first axiom of probability, they also are void of the defining property of a probability distribution from a Coxian and Baysian perspective - they lack the ability to rank plausibility.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.