Paper detail

How interface geometry dictates water's thermodynamic signature in hydrophobic association

As a common view the hydrophobic association between molecular-scale binding partners is supposed to be dominantly driven by entropy. Recent calorimetric experiments and computer simulations heavily challenge this established paradigm by reporting that water's thermodynamic signature in the binding of small hydrophobic ligands to similar-sized apolar pockets is enthalpy-driven. Here we show with purely geometric considerations that this controversy can be resolved if the antagonistic effects of concave and convex bending on water interface thermodynamics are properly taken into account. A key prediction of this continuum view is that for fully complementary binding of the convex ligand to the concave counterpart, water shows a thermodynamic signature very similar to planar (large-scale) hydrophobic association, that is, enthalpy-dominated, and hardly depends on the particular pocket/ligand geometry. A detailed comparison to recent simulation data qualitatively supports the validity of our perspective down to subnanometer scales. Our findings have important implications for the interpretation of thermodynamic signatures found in molecular recognition and association processes. Furthermore, traditional implicit solvent models may benefit from our view with respect to their ability to predict binding free energies and entropies.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.