Paper detail

How Flow Isolation May Set the Mass Scale for Super-Earth Planets

Much recent work on planet formation has focused on the growth of planets by accretion of grains whose aerodynamic properties make them marginally coupled to the nebular gas, a theory commonly referred to as "pebble accretion". While pebble accretion can ameliorate some of the issues presented by growth by purely gravitational processes, it has other issues when compared with observations of exoplanetary systems. A particular concern is the preponderance of planets that end their growth as "super-Earths" or "sub-Neptunes", with masses in the range 2-10 $M_\oplus$. Once planets reach this mass scale, timescales for growth by pebble accretion are so rapid that ubiquitously ending growth here is difficult. In this work, we highlight this issue in detail using our previously published model of pebble accretion, and also propose a possible solution: feedback between the growing planet's atmosphere and the gas disk inhibits accretion of smaller particle sizes by forcing them to flow around the growing planet instead of being accreted. For reasonable fiducial disk parameters this "flow isolation" will inhibit accretion of all available particle sizes once the planet reaches super-Earth masses. We also demonstrate that the characteristics of this "flow isolation mass" agree with previously published trends identified in the \textit{Kepler} planets.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.