Paper detail

How does group interaction and its severance affect life expectancy?

The phenomenon of apoptosis observed in cell cultures consists in the fact that unless cells permanently receive a "Stay alive" signal from their neighbors, they are bound to die. A natural question is whether manifestations of this apoptosis paradigm can also be observed in other organizations of living organisms. In this paper we report results from a two-year long campaign of experiments on three species of ants and one species of (tephritid) fruit flies. In these experiments individuals were separated from their colony and kept in isolation either alone or in groups of 10 individuals. The overall conclusion is that "singles" have a shorter life expectancy than individuals in the groups of 10. This observation holds for ants as well as for fruit flies. The paper also provides compelling evidence of a similar effect in married versus unmarried (i.e. single, widowed or divorced) people. A natural question concerns the dynamic of the transition between the two regimes. Observation suggests an abrupt (rather than smooth) transition and this conclusion seems to hold for ants, fruit flies and humans as well. We call it a shock transition. In addition, for red fire ants Solenopsis invicta, it was observed that individuals in groups of 10 that also comprise one queen, die much faster than those in similar groups without queens. The paper also examines the corresponding survivorship curves from the perspective of the standard classification into 3 types. The survivorship curves of ants (whether single or in groups of 10) are found to be of type II whereas those of the fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis are rather of type III. In this connection it is recalled that the survivorship curve of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is of type I, i.e. of same type as for humans.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.