Paper detail

How do galaxies populate halos in extreme density environments? An analysis of the Halo Occupation Distribution in SDSS

Recent works have shown that the properties of galaxy populations in dark matter halos vary with large-scale environments. These results suggest a variation in the halo occupation distribution (HOD) in extreme density environments. To analyse these effects, we identify cosmic voids and future virialised structures (FVS) in the SDSS-DR12 and estimate the HOD within these superstructures using group catalogues as dark matter halo proxies. Our goal is to use observational galaxy data to characterise the HOD within voids and FVS, explore the different properties of these galaxies populations and compare them with the general results outside these superstructures. Using a galaxy group catalogue we compute the HOD within both types of superstructures. We also study the dependence on the results on the main void and FVS properties. We also analysed the mean stellar age of the galaxies inside these regions. In all cases, we compare the results with those derived from the Field sample. Inside voids, we find a strong decrease in HOD concerning the Field results. The mean number of satellites fall to 50%. Inside FVS, the HOD shows a significant increase to the Field, with a 40% excess in the mean number of satellites. In both regions, the differences with respect to the Field increases for the extreme values of the density environments. We obtain no signs of variations related to intrinsic characteristics of voids and FVS. We find that the cumulative distribution of the mean age of stars of the central galaxy also varies in these regions. Finally, we explore the HOD for the 25% youngest (oldest) galaxies. We find that for the low-mass groups the youngest galaxies are only present inside voids. On the other hand, for the high-mass groups the FVS environments show the same increase in the HOD concerning the Field. We find that cosmic voids lack of oldest galaxies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.