Paper detail

How Devious are Deviations From Quantum Mechanics: The Case of the B^0 \bar B^0 System

Considering semileptonic decays of the entangled B^0 \bar B^0 state which is generated in the decay of Upsilon(4S), we simply multiply the quantum-mechanical interference term by a factor (1-ζ) and use the ``decoherence parameter'' ζas a measure for deviations from quantum mechanics. We investigate several consequences of this modification of semileptonic B^0 \bar B^0 decays. In particular, we show that when confronted with the experimental values of the ratio R=(# like-sign dilepton events)/(# opposite-sign dilepton events) and of the B_H--B_L mass difference, the ensuing one standard deviation range of the decoherence parameter depends strongly on the basis in the B^0--\bar B^0 space used to build the entangled B^0 \bar B^0 state. On the other hand, in quantum mechanics physical quantities are, of course, independent of such arbitrary basis choices.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.