Paper detail

How cosmological merger histories shape the diversity of stellar haloes

We introduce and apply a new approach to probe the response of galactic stellar haloes to the interplay between cosmological merger histories and galaxy formation physics. We perform dark matter-only, zoomed simulations of two Milky Way-mass hosts and make targeted, controlled changes to their cosmological histories using the genetic modification technique. Populating each history's stellar halo with a semi-empirical, particle tagging approach then enables a controlled study, with all instances converging to the same large-scale structure, dynamical and stellar mass at $z=0$ as their reference. These related merger scenarios alone generate an extended spread in stellar halo mass fractions (1.5 dex) comparable to the observed population, with the largest scatter achieved by growing late ($z\leq1$) major mergers that spread out existing stars to create massive, in-situ dominated stellar haloes. Increasing a last major merger at $z\sim2$ brings more accreted stars into the inner regions, resulting in smaller scatter in the outskirts which are predominantly built by subsequent minor events. Exploiting the flexibility of our semi-empirical approach, we show that the diversity of stellar halo masses across scenarios is reduced by allowing shallower slopes in the stellar mass--halo mass relation for dwarf galaxies, while it remains conserved when central stars are born with hotter kinematics across cosmic time. The merger-dependent diversity of stellar haloes thus responds distinctly to assumptions in modelling the central and dwarf galaxies respectively, opening exciting prospects to constrain star formation and feedback at different galactic mass-scales with the coming generation of deep, photometric observatories.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.