Paper detail

How conventional measures overestimate electroweak fine-tuning in supersymmetric theory

The lack of evidence for superparticles at the CERN LHC, along with the rather high value of the Higgs mass, has sharpened the perception that supersymmetric model parameter space is highly electroweak fine-tuned (EWFT). We compare three measures of fine-tuning in SUSY models. 1. \Del_HS measures a terms containing large log contributions to m_Z that are inevitable in models defined at scales much higher than the electroweak scale. 2. \Del_BG measures variation in m_Z against variation of model parameters and allows for correlations among high scale parameters which are not included in \Del_HS. 3. The model-independent \Del_EW measures how naturally a model can generate the measured value of m_Z=91.2 GeV in terms of weak scale parameters alone. We hypothesize an overarching Ultimate Theory (UTH) wherein the high scale soft terms are all correlated. The UTH might be contained within the more general effective SUSY theories popular in the literature. For \Del_HS, EWFT can be overestimated by neglecting additional non-independent terms which lead to large cancellations. For \Del_BG, EWFT can be overestimated by applying the measure to the effective theories instead of to the UTH. The measure \Del_EW allows for the possibility of parameter correlations which should be present in the UTH and, since it is model-independent, provides the same value of EWFT for the effective theories as should occur for the UTH. We find that the well-known mSUGRA/CMSSM model is fine-tuned under all three measures so that it is unlikely to contain the UTH. The non-universal Higgs model NUHM2 appears fine-tuned with \Del_HS,BG > 10^3. But since \Del_EW can be as small as 7 (corresponding to 14% fine-tuning), it may contain the UTH for parameter ranges which allow for low true EWFT.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.