Paper detail

How Consumption and Repulsion Set Planetary Gap Depths and the Final Masses of Gas Giants

Planets open gaps in discs. Gap opening is typically modeled by considering the planetary Lindblad torque which repels disc gas away from the planet's orbit. But gaps also clear because the planet consumes local material. We present a simple, easy-to-use, analytic framework for calculating how gaps deplete and how the disc's structure as a whole changes by the combined action of Lindblad repulsion and planetary consumption. The final mass to which a gap-embedded gas giant grows is derived in tandem. The analytics are tested against 1D numerical experiments and calibrated using published multi-dimensional simulations. In viscous alpha discs, the planet, while clearing a gap, initially accretes practically all of the gas that tries to diffuse past, rapidly achieving super-Jupiter if not brown dwarf status. By contrast, in inviscid discs---that may still accrete onto their central stars by, say, magnetized winds---planets open deep, repulsion-dominated gaps. Then only a small fraction of the disc accretion flow is diverted onto the planet, which grows to a fraction of a Jupiter mass. Transitional disc cavities might be cleared by families of such low-mass objects opening inviscid, repulsion-dominated, overlapping gaps which allow most of the outer disc gas to flow unimpeded onto host stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.