Paper detail

How can young massive clusters reach their present-day sizes?

The classic question that how young massive star clusters attain their shapes and sizes, as we find them today, remains to be a challenge. Both observational and computational studies of star-forming massive molecular gas clouds infer that massive cluster formation is primarily triggered along the small-scale ($\lesssim0.3$ pc) filamentary substructures within the clouds. The present study is intended to investigate the possible ways in which a filament-like-compact, massive star cluster (effective radius 0.1-0.3 pc) can expand $\gtrsim10$ times, still remaining massive enough ($\gtrsim10^4 M_\odot$), to become a young massive star cluster, as we observe today. To that end, model massive clusters (of initially $10^4 M_\odot-10^5 M_\odot$) are evolved using Sverre Aarseth's state-of-the-art N-body code NBODY7. All the computed clusters expand with time, whose sizes (effective radii) are compared with those observed for young massive clusters, of age $\lesssim100$ Myr, in the Milky Way and other nearby galaxies. It is found that beginning from the above compact sizes, a star cluster cannot expand by its own, i.e., due to two-body relaxation, stellar-evolutionary mass loss, dynamical heating by primordial binaries and stellar-mass black holes, up to the observed sizes of young massive clusters; they always remain much more compact compared to the observed ones. This calls for additional mechanisms that can boost the expansion of a massive cluster after its assembly. Using further N-body calculations, it is shown that a substantial residual gas expulsion, with $\approx30$% star formation efficiency, can indeed swell the newborn embedded cluster adequately. The limitations of the present calculations and their consequences are discussed.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.