Paper detail

How can the Standard model Higgs and also the extensions of the Higgs to Yukawa's scalars be interpreted in the spin-charge-family theory and to what predictions about the Higgs does this theory lead?

This contribution is to show how does the spin-charge-family theory interpret the assumptions of the standard model, and those extensions of this model, which are trying to see the Yukawa couplings as scalar fields with the family (flavour) charges in the fundamental representations of the group. The purpose of these contribution is i.) to try to understand why the standard model works so well, although its assumptions look quite artificial, and ii.) how do predictions of the spin-charge-family theory about the measurements of the scalar fields differ from predictions of the {\em standard model}, which has only one scalar field - the Higgs - and also from its more or less direct extensions with Yukawas as the scalar dynamical fields with the family charge in the fundamental or anti-fundamental representation of group.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.