Paper detail

Hot thermal X-ray emission from the Be star HD119682

We present an analysis of a series of four consecutive Chandra high resolution transmission gratings observations, amounting to a total of 150 ks, of the Be X-ray source HD119682 (= 1WGA J1346.5-6255), a member of the new class of gamma Cas analogs. The Chandra lightcurve shows significant brightness variations on timescales of hours. However, the spectral distribution appears rather stable within each observation and during the whole campaign. A detailed analysis is not able to detect any coherent pulsation up to a frequency of 0.05 Hz. The Chandra HETG spectrum seems to be devoid of any strong emission line, including Fe alpha fluorescence. The continuum is well described with the addition of two collisionally ionized plasmas of temperatures kT = 15 keV and 0.2 keV respectively, by the apec model. Models using photoionized plasma components (mekal) or non thermal components (powerlaw) give poorer fits, giving support to the pure thermal scenario. These two components are absorbed by a single column with N_H=(0.20^+0.15-0.03) x 10^22 cm^-2 compatible with the interstellar value. We conclude that HD119682 can be regarded as a pole-on gamma Cas analog.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.