Paper detail

Hot graphite dust in the inner regime of NGC 4151

We model the near infrared SED of NGC 4151 with a 3-D radiative transfer SKIRT code, using which torus only (TO) and Ring And Torus (RAT) scenarios are studied. In the RAT models, a graphite ring-like structure (clumpy or smooth), is incorporated between the torus and the accretion disk. We vary the inclination angle $(i)$, inner radius (of the torus and the ring, $R_{\rm in, t}$ and $R_{\rm in, r}$ respectively), torus half-opening angle ($σ$), optical depth ($τ_{9.7, \rm t} $ of the torus and $τ_{9.7, \rm r} $ of the ring ) and the dust clump size ($R_{\rm clump}$). We perform a statistical analysis of the parameter space and find that all the models are able to explain the flat NIR SED of NGC 4151 with minor differences in the derived parameters. For the TO model, we get, $R_{\rm in, t}=0.1$ pc, $σ= 30^\circ $, $i = 53^\circ $, $τ_{9.7, \rm t}=10$ and the clumpsize, $R_{\rm clump}$ =0.4 pc. For the smooth RAT model, $R_{\rm in, \rm r}=0.04$ pc, $τ_{9.7, \rm total}$ = 11 and for the clumpy RAT model, $R_{\rm in, r} = 0.04$ pc/0.06 pc and $τ_{9.7, \rm total}=20$. The $R_{\rm in, t}$ from the TO model does not agree with the NIR observations ($\sim 0.04$ pc). Hence, the most likely scenario is that a hot graphite ring is located at a distance 0.04 pc from the centre, composed of a smooth distribution of dust followed by a dusty torus at 0.1 pc with ISM type of grains.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.