Paper detail

Hot-Dust (690K) Luminosity Density and its Evolution in the last 7.5Gyr

[Abridged] We study the contribution of hot-dust to the luminosity density of galaxies and its evolution with cosmic time. Using the Spitzer-IRAC data in the COSMOS field, we estimate the contribution from hot-dust at rest-frame 4.2um (from ~0 < z < ~0.2 up to ~0.5 < z < ~0.9). This wavelength corresponds to black-body temperature of ~690K. The contribution due to stellar emission is estimated from the rest-frame 1.6um luminosity (assumed to result from stellar emission alone) and subtracted from the mid-infrared luminosity of galaxies to measure hot-dust emission. In order to attempt the study of the 3.3um-PAH feature, we use the rest-frame 4.2um to infer the hot-dust flux at 3.3um. This study is performed for different spectral types of galaxies: early-type, late-type, starburst, and IR-selected AGN. We find that: (a) the decrease of the hot-dust luminosity density since ~0.5 < z < ~1 is steeper (by at least ~0.5dex) compared to that of the cold-dust, giving support to the scenario where galaxy obscuration increases with redshift, as already proposed in the literature; (b) hot-dust and PAH emission evolution seems to be correlated with stellar mass, where rest-frame 1.6um luminous non-AGN galaxies (i.e., massive systems) show a stronger decrement (with decreasing redshift) in hot-dust and PAH emission than the less luminous (less massive) non-AGN galaxies; (c) despite comprising < ~3% of the total sample, AGN contribute as much as a third to the hot-dust luminosity density at z < 1 and clearly dominate the bright-end of the total hot-dust Luminosity Density Function at ~0.5 < z < ~0.9; (d) the average dust-to-total luminosity ratio increases with redshift, while PAH-to-total luminosity ratio remains fairly constant; (e) at M_1.6 > -25, the dust-to-total and PAH-to-total luminosity ratios increase with decreasing luminosity, but deeper data is required to confirm this result.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.