Paper detail

Host Galaxy Mass Combined with Local Stellar Age Improve Type Ia Supernovae Distances

Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are standardizable candles, but for over a decade, there has been a debate on how to properly account for their correlations with host galaxy properties. Using the Bayesian hierarchical model UNITY, we simultaneously fit for the SN Ia light curve and host galaxy standardization parameters on a set of 103 Sloan Digital Sky Survey II SNe Ia. We investigate the influences of host stellar mass, along with both localized ($r<3$ kpc) and host-integrated average stellar ages, derived from stellar population synthesis modeling. We find that the standardization for the light-curve shape ($α$) is correlated with host galaxy standardization terms ($γ_i$) requiring simultaneous fitting. In addition, we find that these correlations themselves are dependent on host galaxy stellar mass that includes a shift in the color term ($β$) of $0.8 \mathrm{mag}$, only significant at $1.2σ$ due to the small sample. We find a linear host mass standardization term at the $3.7σ$ level, that by itself does not significantly improve the precision of an individual SN Ia distance. However, a standardization that uses both stellar mass and average local stellar age is found to be significant at $>3σ$ in the two-dimensional posterior space. In addition, the unexplained scatter of SNe Ia absolute magnitude post standardization, is reduced from $0.122^{+0.019}_{-0.018}$ to $0.109\pm0.017$ mag, or $\sim10\%$. We do not see similar improvements when using global ages. This combination is consistent with either metallicity or line-of-sight dust affecting the observed luminosity of SNe Ia.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.