Paper detail

Host Galaxies of Ultra Strong Mg II absorbers at z $\sim$ 0.5

From a sample of 109 candidate Ultra-Strong Mg II (USMgII; having rest equivalent width of Mg II absorption, $W_{2796}>3.0$ Angstrom) systems at z=0.4-0.6, we confirm 27 and identify host galaxies of 20 systems based on associated nebular line emission from our SALT observations or from SDSS fiber spectra. The measured impact parameter, [O II] luminosity, star formation rate, B-band luminosity and stellar mass are in the ranges $7.3\le D[kpc]\le79$, $0.2\le L_{[O II]}[ 10^{41}~erg s^{-1}]$ $\le 4.5$, $2.59\le SFR[M_\odot yr^{-1} ]\le 33.51$, $0.15L_B^*\le L_B\le1.63L_B^*$ and $10.21\le log[M_*/M_\odot]\le11.62$ respectively. The impact parameters found are larger than that predicted by the $W_{2796}$ vs D relationship of the general population of Mg II absorbers. At a given D, USMgII host galaxies are more luminous and massive compared to typical Mg II absorbers. However, the measured SFRs are slightly lower than that of main-sequence galaxies with the same M$_\star$ at $z\sim0.5$. We report a correlation between $L_{[O II]}$ and W$_{2796}$ for the full population of Mg II absorbers, driven mainly by the host galaxies of weak Mg II absorbers that tend to have low $L_{[O II]}$ and large impact parameters. We find at least $\sim$33% of the USMgII host galaxies (with a limiting magnitude of $m_r<23.6$) are isolated and the large $W_{2796}$ in these cases may originate from gas flows (infall/outflow) in single halos of massive but not starburst galaxies. We also find galaxy interactions could be responsible for large velocity widths in at least $\sim$17% cases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.