Paper detail

Horton Law in Self-Similar Trees

Self-similarity of random trees is related to the operation of pruning. Pruning $R$ cuts the leaves and their parental edges and removes the resulting chains of degree-two nodes from a finite tree. A Horton-Strahler order of a vertex $v$ and its parental edge is defined as the minimal number of prunings necessary to eliminate the subtree rooted at $v$. A branch is a group of neighboring vertices and edges of the same order. The Horton numbers $N_k[K]$ and $N_{ij}[K]$ are defined as the expected number of branches of order $k$, and the expected number of order-$i$ branches that merged order-$j$ branches, $j>i$, respectively, in a finite tree of order $K$. The Tokunaga coefficients are defined as $T_{ij}[K]=N_{ij}[K]/N_j[K]$. The pruning decreases the orders of tree vertices by unity. A rooted full binary tree is said to be mean-self-similar if its Tokunaga coefficients are invariant with respect to pruning: $T_k:=T_{i,i+k}[K]$. We show that for self-similar trees, the condition $\limsup(T_k)^{1/k}<\infty$ is necessary and sufficient for the existence of the strong Horton law: $N_k[K]/N_1[K] \rightarrow R^{1-k}$, as $K \rightarrow \infty$ for some $R>0$ and every $k\geq 1$. This work is a step toward providing rigorous foundations for the Horton law that, being omnipresent in natural branching systems, has escaped so far a formal explanation.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.