Paper detail

Hormonal Factors Moderate the Associations Between Vascular Risk Factors and White Matter Hyperintensities

Objective: To examine the moderation effects of hormonal factors on the associations between vascular risk factors and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) in men and women, separately. Methods: WMH were automatically segmented and quantified in the UK Biobank dataset (N = 18,294). Generalised linear models were applied to examine 1) the main effects of vascular (body mass index, hip to waist ratio, pulse wave velocity, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertension, smoking status) and hormonal (testosterone levels, contraceptive pill, hormone replacement therapy, menopause) factors on WMH, and 2) the moderation effects of hormonal factors on the relationship between vascular risk factors and WMH volumes. Results: In men with testosterone levels one standard deviation (SD) higher than the mean value, increased body mass index and pulse wave velocity, and smoking were associated with higher WMH volumes. The association between body mass index and WMH was more significant in the periventricular white matter regions, whilst the relationship between pulse wave velocity and WMH was restricted to deep white matter regions. Men with low testosterone levels (one SD below the mean level) showed a significant association between hypercholesterolemia and higher deep WMH volumes. Hypertensive women showed higher WMH volumes than women without hypertension regardless of whether hormone replacement therapy was used. However, higher WMH volumes, especially in the deep white matter regions, were found in women who did not use hormone replacement therapy or use it for a shorter duration. Conclusion: These findings highlighted the importance of considering hormonal risk factors in the prevention and management of WMH.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.