Paper detail

Horizontal gene transfer may explain variation in θs

Martincorena et al. estimated synonymous diversity (θs = 2Nμ) across 2,930 orthologous gene alignments from 34 Escherichia coli genomes, and found substantial variation among genes in the density of synonymous polymorphisms. They argue that this pattern reflects variation in the mutation rate per nucleotide (μ) among genes. However, the effective population size (N) is not necessarily constant across the genome. In particular, different genes may have different histories of horizontal gene transfer (HGT), whereas Martincorena et al. used a model with random recombination to calculate θs. They did filter alignments in an effort to minimize the effects of HGT, but we doubt that any procedure can completely eliminate HGT among closely related genomes, such as E. coli living in the complex gut community. Here we show that there is no significant variation among genes in rates of synonymous substitutions in a long-term evolution experiment with E. coli and that the per-gene rates are not correlated with θs estimates from genome comparisons. However, there is a significant association between θs and HGT events. Together, these findings imply that θs variation reflects different histories of HGT, not local optimization of mutation rates to reduce the risk of deleterious mutations as proposed by Martincorena et al.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.