Paper detail

Horizons and the Wave Function of Planckian Quantum black holes

At the Planck scale the distinction between elementary particles and black holes becomes fuzzy. The very definition of a "quantum black hole" (QBH) is an open issue. Starting from the idea that, at the Planck scale, the radius of the event horizon undergoes quantum oscillations, we introduce a black hole mass-radius Generalised Uncertainty Principle (GUP) and derive a corresponding gravitational wavelength. Next we recover a GUP encoding effective geometry. This semi-classical gravitational description admits black hole configurations only for masses higher than the Planck mass. Quantum corrections lead to a vanishing Hawking temperature when the Planck mass is approached from above. Finally we replace our semi-classical model by a relativistic wave equation for the "horizon wave function". The solution admits a discrete mass spectrum which is bounded from below by a stable ground state with energy close to the Planck mass. Interestingly higher angular momentum states fit onto Regge trajectories indicating their stringy nature.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.